GRIDLINEPICKS
Gridline · 2026 Season

Week 3, Settled

Fifty‑six plays, published before kickoff and graded against the final box score at the stake printed beside each one. The first full week of two tracks on one card, a losing week on both, and the last week of the early‑season window that the model is built to work through.

The early‑season window

Before the numbers, the calendar. Many of the model’s most important inputs are rolling windows of the current season: how an offense and a defense have performed over their last four games, and their last eight, adjusted for who they played. Through Week 4 those windows are not yet full, and the model leans on last season as its prior for the parts of a team that have not yet shown themselves this year. Weeks 1 through 3 are, by design, the stretch where it knows the least, and we said as much before the season.

Looking back over the last three seasons, the model’s best stretch has come once those windows fill, from Week 5 through Week 8, and its confident calls have landed most often in exactly that span. That is an expectation, not a promise, and we will grade it in public like everything else. But it is the reason to read the first three weeks as a wildcard we anticipated rather than as the shape of the season.

Everything we published
−12.35u
56 plays · 42.5 units risked
17–34–5 across the full board
Highlighted card only
−11.46u
29 picks · 23.0 units risked
7–19–3 on the highlighted card
Overall hit rate 33.3%Break‑even needed 50.5%95% interval 22.0–47.0%

Three weeks in, the season ledger on published plays stands at 86–125–8, −24.56u. Not as costly as Week 2, and the shape of it is the same: the count of losses was bad, and the losses landed on the bigger stakes. The interval is wide this early and narrows with every week we publish; we will keep showing it.

Two tracks, graded side by side

This was the first full week of the card carrying both Model picks and Analyst picks, each graded on its own. Neither track cleared its break‑even. The model track went 2–7–3 on the card; the analyst track went 5–12. Across everything published, the split is below.

TrackPlaysW–LRiskedReturned
Model picks, on the card122–7–39.0u−5.22u
Analyst picks, on the card175–1214.0u−6.24u
Model picks, everything published3912–22–528.5u−6.11u
Analyst picks, everything published175–1214.0u−6.24u

What the analyst track got right was volume: Jordan Love’s attempts, Drake London’s catches, Jaxon Smith‑Njigba’s catches, Quinshon Judkins’ rushing yards, and Monday’s under. What it got wrong was game lines, which went 1–5, and the plays the whole market had already seen coming: Dalton Schultz and C.J. Stroud with Nico Collins out, Seattle laying eight and a half against a backup quarterback. When the line has already moved on the news, the news is no longer an edge.

The most instructive play of the week is the one we argued ourselves out of in writing and kept on the card anyway. The model had Chicago to win outright on Monday night from Wednesday onward, at prices as long as +160, and our written read leaned the other way: a third‑string quarterback was starting, and that seemed to settle it. The pick stayed live at +154, and Chicago won 27–7 with Case Keenum throwing for 247 yards and two touchdowns. The lesson is not that the model is always right. It is that when the market has already moved five points on a story, the story is no longer an edge — and it is not a reason to fade a number either. That goes into how the two tracks are weighed from here.

Where the week actually went

Ten markets became published plays. The two that finished ahead were the small ones: pass attempts went 1–0 and passing touchdowns 1–1. Receptions carried the volume again and, again, the split inside it is the story.

MarketPlaysW–LRiskedReturned
Receptions2811–13–425.0u−2.00u
Anytime TD80–7–13.5u−3.50u
Rush attempts51–43.5u−2.60u
Rushing yards31–22.5u−1.53u
Pass TDs21–11.0u+0.14u
Pass attempts11–01.0u+0.89u
Passing yards10–11.0u−1.00u
Total41–33.0u−2.02u
Spread20–21.0u−1.00u
Moneyline21–11.0u+0.27u
All published5617–34–542.5u−12.35u

Receptions unders went 7–6–1 for +2.50u. Receptions overs went 4–7–3 for −4.50u, and the pattern is the one Week 2 showed: plus‑money overs on secondary receivers, where the model’s number sat furthest from the market’s. Anytime touchdown went 0–7 with one void, at the half‑unit rule, which is what the rule is for. Three weeks of this is enough to act on, and the section below does.

Tiers and days

Thursday was the week’s bright spot: all three card picks in Atlanta at Green Bay landed, and the night went 4–1 for +2.80u. Sunday carried the volume and the losses. Monday’s four plays finished ahead, on the under and Chicago’s outright win.

SlicePlaysW–LRiskedReturned
Strong edge (model)184–10–418.5u−4.58u
Edge (model)218–12–110.0u−1.53u
Thursday54–14.5u+2.80u
Sunday4711–32–436.5u−15.90u
Monday42–1–11.5u+0.75u

For the third week the higher tier did not separate from the lower one. Across three weeks the picks where the model’s number sits furthest from the market’s have landed least often, not most. That is the single most important thing the record has told us, and it changes how the card is built.

What is different in Week 4

Three weeks is still a short record, so these are the changes the record already supports, in the order they matter.

The windows fill. From Week 4’s games onward the model’s rolling measures of this season’s form begin to replace last season’s priors, and by Week 5 they are fully in. Nothing about that is a change we made; it is the calendar the model was built for, and the stretch where it has historically been at its best.
If he is out, he is out. The starter each team fields now follows the injury report and the week’s confirmed starters rather than the standing depth chart, so a ruled‑out quarterback is never the quarterback the model is projecting, and the next man’s ratings are. Monday night was built on Case Keenum, not Caleb Williams.
Sharper matchup inputs. Each week’s board now carries opponent‑specific defensive splits, play‑calling tendencies, officiating crews and offensive‑line continuity, refreshed every Tuesday and checked before anything is published. More of what the research pass has been supplying by hand is now in front of the model.
The model as a screen, not a ranking. For three weeks the card was ordered by how far the model’s number sat from the market’s, and those were the picks that lost most. From Week 4 the model’s number is used the other way round: a pick has to be one where the model and the market lean the same way, within a few points of each other, and the card is chosen from those. The model still decides what is playable; it no longer decides that the biggest disagreement is the best bet.
Fewer markets, flatter stakes. Anytime touchdown, moneylines and plus‑money receptions overs come off the highlighted card until a hundred‑pick record earns them back; they remain on the full board as context. The card is eight to ten picks drawn from the markets that have held up, at half a unit to one unit each, with nothing above one unit until a tier has a record that supports it.
The analyst track narrows. Game sides and totals are out. The research track plays volume and game script — attempts, carries, catches that an injury or a plan makes near‑certain — and skips any play where the line has already moved on the news it is built on. It also stops overriding the model when the market has fully priced the story; Monday night is the reason.
Closing lines, every week. Every published price is compared with the closing line from Week 4 on, so you can see whether a play beat the close before you see whether it won. It is the fastest honest test of any of the above.

Every play, all 56

Every play, ordered by game day, at the stake printed on the card at the time. Analyst marks the research track; Strong edge and Edge are the model’s tiers. Nothing here is selected after the fact: this is the same list that was live before kickoff. A void is a play that never truly settled and returns the stake; Week 3 had five.

Swipe the table sideways for price, result and units.

PickGameMarketTrackStakePriceResultUnits
Jordan Love Over 31.5 pass attemptsATL @ GBPass attemptsAnalyst1.0u-112Won+0.89
Austin Hooper Over 0.5 receptionsATL @ GBReceptionsStrong edge1.5u-148Won+1.01
Drake London Over 5.5 receptionsATL @ GBReceptionsAnalyst1.0u+100Won+1.00
Tucker Kraft Under 3.5 receptionsATL @ GBReceptionsEdge0.5u+128Lost-0.50
Kaleb Johnson Under 10.5 rush attemptsATL @ GBRush attemptsEdge0.5u-124Won+0.40
Dak Prescott Under 1.5 passing tdsBAL @ DALPass TDsEdge0.5u+128Won+0.64
Lamar Jackson Under 1.5 passing tdsBAL @ DALPass TDsEdge0.5u+124Lost-0.50
CeeDee Lamb Under 6.5 receptionsBAL @ DALReceptionsEdge0.5u-109Lost-0.50
George Pickens Under 5.5 receptionsBAL @ DALReceptionsEdge0.5u-134Lost-0.50
Jake Ferguson Under 3.5 receptionsBAL @ DALReceptionsEdge0.5u-101Won+0.50
Javonte Williams Under 14.5 rush attemptsBAL @ DALRush attemptsEdge0.5u+100Lost-0.50
Derrick Henry Over 90.5 rushing yardsBAL @ DALRushing yardsAnalyst1.0u-109Lost-1.00
Under 53.5BAL @ DALTotalAnalyst0.5u-112Lost-0.50
Quinshon Judkins Anytime TDCAR @ CLEAnytime TDAnalyst0.5u+105Lost-0.50
Jerry Jeudy Over 1.5 receptionsCAR @ CLEReceptionsStrong edge1.5u-149Lost-1.50
Chuba Hubbard Under 17.5 rush attemptsCAR @ CLERush attemptsEdge0.5u-130Lost-0.50
Quinshon Judkins Over 61.5 rushing yardsCAR @ CLERushing yardsAnalyst0.5u-107Won+0.47
Drew Sample Over 1.5 receptionsCIN @ PITReceptionsEdge0.5u+141Lost-0.50
Erick All Over 0.5 receptionsCIN @ PITReceptionsStrong edge1.0u-139Lost-1.00
Ja'Marr Chase Under 6.5 receptionsCIN @ PITReceptionsEdge0.5u+108Lost-0.50
Jaylen Warren Under 4.5 receptionsCIN @ PITReceptionsStrong edge2.0u-159Won+1.26
Under 42.5CIN @ PITTotalAnalyst1.0u-110Lost-1.00
C.J. Stroud Over 236.5 passing yardsHOU @ INDPassing yardsAnalyst1.0u-108Lost-1.00
Dalton Schultz Over 5.5 receptionsHOU @ INDReceptionsAnalyst1.5u+100Lost-1.50
Darius Slayton Over 1.5 receptionsHOU @ INDReceptionsStrong edge0.5u+169Void—
Woody Marks Over 8.5 rush attemptsHOU @ INDRush attemptsStrong edge1.5u-107Lost-1.50
Over 42.5HOU @ INDTotalAnalyst1.0u-112Lost-1.00
De'Von Achane Anytime TDKC @ MIAAnytime TDStrong edge0.5u+120Void—
Malik Washington Under 3.5 receptionsKC @ MIAReceptionsEdge0.5u-104Lost-0.50
LA MLLA @ DENMoneylineStrong edge0.5u-125Lost-0.50
Jaylen Waddle Under 4.5 receptionsLA @ DENReceptionsEdge0.5u+121Won+0.60
Terrance Ferguson Under 3.5 receptionsLA @ DENReceptionsStrong edge2.0u+129Won+2.58
RJ Harvey Over 5.5 rush attemptsLA @ DENRush attemptsStrong edge0.5u-126Lost-0.50
Ladd McConkey Under 4.5 receptionsLAC @ BUFReceptionsEdge0.5u+116Won+0.58
Oronde Gadsden II Under 3.5 receptionsLAC @ BUFReceptionsEdge0.5u-130Won+0.38
Alvin Kamara Anytime TDLV @ NOAnytime TDStrong edge0.5u+180Lost-0.50
Ashton Jeanty Anytime TDLV @ NOAnytime TDStrong edge0.5u-110Lost-0.50
Ashton Jeanty Over 3.5 receptionsLV @ NOReceptionsAnalyst1.0u-125Lost-1.00
Bucky Irving Anytime TDMIN @ TBAnytime TDStrong edge0.5u+130Lost-0.50
Jalen McMillan Over 1.5 receptionsMIN @ TBReceptionsStrong edge1.0u+129Void—
Jauan Jennings Over 1.5 receptionsMIN @ TBReceptionsEdge0.5u+101Lost-0.50
Rhamondre Stevenson Anytime TDNE @ JAXAnytime TDEdge0.5u+145Lost-0.50
TreVeyon Henderson Anytime TDNE @ JAXAnytime TDEdge0.5u+185Lost-0.50
Bhayshul Tuten Under 1.5 receptionsNE @ JAXReceptionsStrong edge1.5u-108Lost-1.50
Hunter Henry Under 3.5 receptionsNE @ JAXReceptionsEdge0.5u+120Won+0.60
Adonai Mitchell Under 3.5 receptionsNYJ @ DETReceptionsEdge0.5u-106Void—
Jeremy Ruckert Over 0.5 receptionsNYJ @ DETReceptionsStrong edge2.5u-233Won+1.07
Breece Hall Over 60.5 rushing yardsNYJ @ DETRushing yardsAnalyst1.0u-108Lost-1.00
NYJ +6.5NYJ @ DETSpreadAnalyst0.5u-105Lost-0.50
Jaxon Smith-Njigba Over 6.5 receptionsSEA @ WASReceptionsAnalyst1.0u-109Won+0.92
SEA -8.5SEA @ WASSpreadAnalyst0.5u-105Lost-0.50
Elic Ayomanor Over 1.5 receptionsTEN @ NYGReceptionsStrong edge2.5u+125Lost-2.50
CHI MLPHI @ CHIMoneylineEdge0.5u+154Won+0.77
D'Andre Swift Anytime TDPHI @ CHIAnytime TDAnalyst0.5u+110Lost-0.50
Darius Cooper Over 0.5 receptionsPHI @ CHIReceptionsStrong edge0.5u-125Void—
Under 41.5PHI @ CHITotalAnalyst0.5u-105Won+0.48

How this is graded. Every play is settled against the official box score at the price and stake published before kickoff. Break‑even is computed from each group’s own realised prices rather than one blanket number, because a book of plus‑money picks needs a lower hit rate than a book of favorites. Pushes return the stake; Week 3 had none. Voids are stored and counted, and excluded from both the hit rate and the return; Week 3 had five — two receivers who were inactive, two who left their games early and had their props voided at the book, and one whose line was no longer available at kickoff. Picks that were still pending when a game day’s card was rebuilt are not counted — only the plays that were live at kickoff are.

A record that grows. Week 3 is the third entry in a season‑long ledger, and every week adds to it in public. Nothing here is a guarantee: sports betting carries real risk, we never publish parlays because combining picks compounds the hold against you, and you should only ever stake what you can afford to lose.